Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Zimbabwe

ZWE · ZIMBABWE · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN). Supports a legally binding treaty that prohibits some systems.

Zimbabwe among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
ZWARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUY
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
ALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN), since 2024-10-14, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

At the Geneva weapons convention in 2015, Zimbabwe joined calls for a pre-emptive ban on lethal autonomous weapons. Since 2024 it has called at the UN First Committee for a legally binding treaty, saying life and death decisions must never be left to machines. On this site's scale that is a treaty with bans.

Zimbabwe calls for a pre-emptive ban on lethal autonomous weapons systems at the CCW.

we join like-minded delegations in calling for a pre-emptive ban on lethal autonomous weapons systems

Statement by Zimbabwe, Meeting of High Contracting Parties to the CCW, 12-13 November 2015, 2015-11-12 source

Zimbabwe calls for early negotiation of a legally binding treaty on autonomous weapons.

we call for early negotiations of an international legally binding treaty on autonomous weapons systems

Statement by Zimbabwe, First Committee general debate, 79th session, 2024-10-14 source

Zimbabwe says life and death decisions must never be handed to machines, in the same passage that calls for urgent treaty negotiations.

Decisions over life and death must never be delegated to machines or algorithms.

Statement by Zimbabwe, First Committee general debate, 80th session, 2025-10-10 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Zimbabwe

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 1
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 0
No treaty-track membership on recordNone recorded

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

7acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.