Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

South Africa

ZAF · SOUTH AFRICA · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN). Supports negotiating a treaty but has not said what it should prohibit.

South Africa among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
ARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
ZAALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN), since 2021-12-13, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

South Africa wants the Geneva expert group's work to end in a legally binding instrument, and said in 2021 that a political document alone would count as failure. In 2025 it said the group's draft text should lead to negotiations on a legally binding instrument. It has not said what that instrument should ban, and it wants the work kept inside the Geneva convention.

South Africa says a purely political outcome with no path to a binding instrument would be a failure.

with no prospect of elevating further work to the level of a legally binding instrument, SA would regard the process as having been a failure.

South African statement to the Sixth Review Conference of the High Contracting Parties to the CCW, 2021-12-13 source

South Africa says the expert group's elements should lead to negotiations on a legally binding instrument.

formulate elements that will serve as a basis for the commencement of negotiations for a legally binding instrument.

Statement by South Africa, First Committee thematic debate on conventional weapons (cluster 4), 80th session, 2025-10-23 source

South Africa wants the Geneva expert group to finish its work without parallel processes in New York.

South Africa is of the view that we should allow the GGE processes to be completed without prejudging the outcome

South African explanation of vote on A/C.1/79/L.77, Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems, 2024-11-06 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting South Africa

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 0
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 0
No treaty-track membership on recordNone recorded

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

6acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.