Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

New Zealand

NZL · NEW ZEALAND · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN). Supports a legally binding treaty that prohibits some systems.

New Zealand among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
NZARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNLNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
ALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN), since 2021-11-16, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

In November 2021 the New Zealand Cabinet decided that the country would push for a legally binding instrument that bans autonomous weapons that cannot be predicted or controlled and sets controls on the rest. New Zealand repeated this two-tier aim in its 2024 submission to the UN Secretary-General and in its statements to the Geneva expert group.

The Cabinet decided New Zealand will advocate for a legally binding instrument on autonomous weapons.

Aotearoa New Zealand will advocate for a legally-binding instrument to articulate these rules or limits

Autonomous Weapons Systems: New Zealand Policy Position and Approach for International Engagement (Cabinet minute ERS-21-MIN-0046), 2021-11-16 source

The same decision commits New Zealand to seek an express prohibition on some systems, alongside controls on others.

pursue an express prohibition on autonomous weapons systems that are not sufficiently predictable or controllable to meet legal or ethical requirements

Autonomous Weapons Systems: New Zealand Policy Position and Approach for International Engagement (Cabinet minute ERS-21-MIN-0046), 2021-11-16 source

The 2024 submission to the Secretary-General restates the aim of binding prohibitions and regulation.

New Zealand continues to seek binding international prohibitions and regulation of AWS.

UNGA Resolution 78/241: Submission by New Zealand, 2024-05-21 source

At the March 2024 expert group session New Zealand backed the two-tier approach with a specific prohibition.

Our ambition is for a new, specific prohibition on weapons that cannot operate in compliance with IHL

CCW Group of Governmental Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems: New Zealand statement, March 2024 session, 2024-03-04 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting New Zealand

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 1
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 4
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/78/L.56 as tabled (became resolution 78/241)Member · 2023-10-12
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/79/L.77 as tabled (became resolution 79/62)Member · 2024-10-18
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/80/L.41 as tabled (became resolution 80/57)Member · 2025-10-14
Joint statement to the September 2025 session of the CCW GGE on LAWS, delivered by BrazilMember · 2025-09-01

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

11acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.