Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Norway

NOR · NORWAY · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN). Supports negotiating a treaty but has not said what it should prohibit.

Norway among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
ARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
NOALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN), since 2024-08-26, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

Norway says plainly that it supports a treaty to clarify how the laws of war apply to autonomous weapons, backs the two-tier approach, and co-wrote the seven-state paper with Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, and Luxembourg. It is read as "terms open" rather than "with bans" because its own words support a treaty to clarify the law, without framing it around a ban. The reading follows what Norway said.

Norway supports a legally binding instrument clarifying IHL application to autonomous weapons.

Norway supports the development of a legally binding instrument in order to clarify the application of international humanitarian law to autonomous weapons systems

Statement by Norway to the CCW Group of Governmental Experts on LAWS, second 2024 session, 2024-08-26 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Norway

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 2
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionEndorsed · 2026-02-05
Treaty / governance trackMember 2
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/78/L.56 as tabled (became resolution 78/241)Member · 2023-10-12
Joint statement to the September 2025 session of the CCW GGE on LAWS, delivered by BrazilMember · 2025-09-01

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

8acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.