Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Netherlands

NLD · NETHERLANDS (KINGDOM OF THE) · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN). Supports a legally binding treaty that prohibits some systems.

Netherlands among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
NLARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
ALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN), since 2024-04-26, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

In its 2024 submission to the Secretary-General, the Netherlands said that autonomous weapons that cannot be used in line with international law must be prohibited by a legally binding instrument, preferably a new protocol to the Geneva convention, and that other types need further regulation. That is a treaty with bans in a two-tier form. The submission says the 2022 government letter to parliament is the basis of this policy, so the position likely predates the submission; the date marks the earliest record opened. The Netherlands voted Yes on all three UN resolutions.

The Netherlands says AWS that cannot comply with international law must be prohibited through a legally binding instrument, preferably a new CCW protocol.

must be explicitly prohibited through a legally binding instrument, preferably by adding a new protocol to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW).

Kingdom of the Netherlands: Submission in accordance with resolution 78/241 on autonomous weapons systems, 2024-04-26 source

The submission places all other AWS under regulation, the second tier.

Other types of AWS require further regulation.

Kingdom of the Netherlands: Submission in accordance with resolution 78/241 on autonomous weapons systems, 2024-04-26 source

The submission asks a new legally binding instrument to define the categories the prohibition covers.

a new international legally binding instrument, such as a new protocol to the CCW, should clearly delineate the types of AWS

Kingdom of the Netherlands: Submission in accordance with resolution 78/241 on autonomous weapons systems, 2024-04-26 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Netherlands

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 3
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Call to ActionEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionEndorsed · 2026-02-05
Treaty / governance trackMember 1
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/78/L.56 as tabled (became resolution 78/241)Member · 2023-10-12

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

8acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.