Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Mexico

MEX · MEXICO · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN). Supports a legally binding treaty that prohibits some systems.

Mexico among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
MXARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
ALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN), since 2021-06-28, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

In 2021 Mexico, with Brazil and Chile, set out an outline of a legally binding instrument made of prohibitions and regulations. Its 2024 and 2025 submissions to the UN Secretary-General say the same in Mexico's own name: a treaty that bans some autonomous weapons and regulates the rest. Mexico helped start the UN resolution track and voted Yes on all three resolutions.

The 2021 paper by Brazil, Chile and Mexico proposes an outline of an instrument of prohibitions and regulations.

propose the following outline of a normative framework, conducive to an instrument establishing prohibitions and regulations

Elements for a Future Normative Framework Conducive to a Legally Binding Instrument to Address the Ethical, Humanitarian and Legal Concerns posed by Emerging Technologies in the Area of (Lethal) Autonomous Weapons (LAWS). Submitted by Brazil, Chile and Mexico, 2021-06-28 source

Mexico's own 2024 submission calls for a legally binding instrument with prohibitions and regulations.

considers it necessary to adopt a legally binding instrument that establishes prohibitions and regulations on autonomous weapons systems [es]

Lethal autonomous weapons systems: report of the Secretary-General (A/79/88), 2024-05-24 source

In 2025 Mexico repeats the call to negotiate a legally binding instrument with specific prohibitions and regulations.

Mexico insists on the urgency of initiating negotiations on a legally binding instrument that establishes specific prohibitions and regulations on lethal autonomous weapons systems [es]

Artificial intelligence in the military domain and its implications for international peace and security: report of the Secretary-General (A/80/78), 2025-04-10 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Mexico

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 0
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 4
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/78/L.56 as tabled (became resolution 78/241)Member · 2023-10-12
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/79/L.77 as tabled (became resolution 79/62)Member · 2024-10-18
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/80/L.41 as tabled (became resolution 80/57)Member · 2025-10-14
Joint statement to the September 2025 session of the CCW GGE on LAWS, delivered by BrazilMember · 2025-09-01

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

10acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.