Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Lesotho

LSO · LESOTHO · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: unclear or shifting (AMBIG). Has said things that point in more than one direction.

Unclear or shifting (AMBIG), since 2023-10-23, points both ways (AMBIGUOUS)

Lesotho's own words point two ways. In 2023 it told the UN First Committee that autonomous weapons do not comply with the laws of war and should not be developed or used, which points toward a ban. Since then it has called for human control and urgent negotiations to regulate them, without saying whether the rules should be legally binding.

Lesotho says autonomous weapons should not be developed or used.

It is our considered view that such autonomous weapons systems do not comply with humanitarian law, and they should not be developed or used.

Statement by Lesotho, First Committee thematic debate on conventional weapons, 78th session, 2023-10-23 source

Lesotho says LAWS must stay under direct, meaningful human control at all times.

We are of the view that Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems must remain under the direct, meaningful control and supervision of humans at all times.

Statement by Lesotho, First Committee general debate, 79th session, 2024-10-16 source

Lesotho calls for prioritising negotiations on regulating emerging technologies, especially LAWS.

reaching urgent consensus on the regulation of the use of emerging technologies including artificial intelligence in the military domain, especially in lethal autonomous weapons systems

Statement by Lesotho, First Committee general debate, 80th session, 2025-10-15 source

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Lesotho

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 0
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 1
Joint statement to the September 2025 session of the CCW GGE on LAWS, delivered by BrazilMember · 2025-09-01

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

7acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.