Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Lebanon

LBN · LEBANON · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN). Supports a legally binding treaty that prohibits some systems.

Lebanon among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
LBARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
ALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN), since 2024-06-24, interpreted (INFERRED)

In its 2024 submission to the UN Secretary-General, Lebanon called for a new protocol to the Geneva weapons convention to regulate autonomous weapons, and said they should be banned for now, until an international agreement regulates them. That is a treaty with bans. The submission is in Arabic only, so this reading is a description. In English in 2023, Lebanon asked states for commitments that keep meaningful human control. Lebanon voted Yes on all three UN resolutions.

Lebanon wants a new CCW protocol on autonomous weapons and a ban on them until one is agreed.

Arabic-only submission under resolution 78/241, sent with an English cover note dated 24 June 2024. Six points: the weapons can adapt and learn through AI; humans have no role in choosing the target, time and place once deployed; responsibility is lost; they cannot be relied on to distinguish combatants from civilians or to respect proportionality; giving a machine freedom to kill threatens human life and dignity. Point 6 says their use may conflict with Article 36 of Additional Protocol I, so new texts are needed to regulate their use through a sixth protocol to the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, consistent with international humanitarian law, and that this type of weapon must be prohibited for now until it is regulated through an international agreement. UNGA Resolution 78/241: Submission by Lebanon (Arabic, Note Ref. 940/24), 2024-06-24 source

Lebanon asks states for commitments that keep meaningful human control over autonomous weapons.

requires a more thorough and targeted discussions and commitments by member states to insure meaningful human control over them

Statement by Lebanon, First Committee general debate, 78th session, 2023-10-06 source

Lebanon repeats in 2025 that states need fuller commitments to keep effective human control.

Arabic statement in the 2025 general debate by Ambassador Ahmad Arafa. Lebanon says integrating AI into military systems is likely to speed the shift toward more complex autonomous weapons, which requires more comprehensive and targeted discussions and commitments from member states to ensure effective human control over these weapons. Statement by Lebanon, First Committee general debate, 80th session (Arabic), 2025-10-15 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Lebanon

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 0
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 0
No treaty-track membership on recordNone recorded

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

6acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.