Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Kazakhstan

KAZ · KAZAKHSTAN · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN). Supports a legally binding treaty that prohibits some systems.

Kazakhstan among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
KZARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKEKILBLUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
ALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN), since 2022-08-09, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

Kazakhstan co-wrote Draft Protocol VI in August 2022, a proposed treaty for the Geneva weapons convention. It would ban autonomous weapons that attack without meaningful human control and cannot comply with the laws of war, and regulate the rest. Putting its name on a draft treaty is the most direct position a state can take.

Kazakhstan co-authored a draft CCW protocol whose prohibition on autonomous weapons is conditional, and is paired with regulation of the rest.

It is prohibited to develop, produce, possess, acquire, deploy, transfer, or use under any circumstances autonomous weapons systems if:

Draft Protocol VI (CCW/GGE.1/2022/WP.8), 2022-08-09 source

The prohibition is conditional, and its first condition is that the system's autonomous functions are designed to attack outside meaningful human control.

its autonomous functions are designed to be used to conduct attacks outside meaningful human control

Draft Protocol VI (CCW/GGE.1/2022/WP.8), 2022-08-09 source

The draft protocol pairs the prohibition with a meaningful-human-control regulation across the life cycle.

Each High Contracting Party shall institute measures to ensure that meaningful human control is retained in the entire life cycle

Draft Protocol VI (CCW/GGE.1/2022/WP.8), 2022-08-09 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Kazakhstan

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 0
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 3
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/78/L.56 as tabled (became resolution 78/241)Member · 2023-10-12
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/80/L.41 as tabled (became resolution 80/57)Member · 2025-10-14
Joint statement to the September 2025 session of the CCW GGE on LAWS, delivered by BrazilMember · 2025-09-01

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

7acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.