Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Iraq

IRQ · IRAQ · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN). Supports negotiating a treaty but has not said what it should prohibit.

Iraq among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
ARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
IQALDZBEBFCICDGQIDJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN), since 2023-10-23, interpreted (INFERRED)

In the First Committee's 2023 debate on conventional weapons, Iraq called for legally binding rules to deal with lethal autonomous weapons, pointing to the risk that they spread or fall into the hands of terrorist groups. It did not say the rules should ban anything. The statement is in Arabic only, so this reading is a description. Iraq voted Yes on all three UN resolutions.

Iraq calls for legally binding provisions on lethal autonomous weapons, without naming prohibitions.

Arabic-only national statement in the conventional weapons debate, delivered by First Secretary Hamza Habib al-Sadr. After a passage on illicit arms trafficking and the ammunition working group, Iraq says its delegation calls for establishing legally binding provisions to address the challenges of emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapons systems, taking into account the risks of their proliferation and of their falling into the hands of terrorist groups. Statement by Iraq, First Committee thematic debate on conventional weapons, 78th session (Arabic), 2023-10-23 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Iraq

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 1
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 0
No treaty-track membership on recordNone recorded

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

5acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.