Machine Politics Updated through 2026-02-06

State dossier

India

IND · INDIA · board row present

What does this state want?

Coded CCW-ONLY: Supports the CCW/GGE consensus process only, no stated outcome position.

India among the states coded so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
LBI-BAN
Binding, ban+regulate
ARAUCRECSLFRDEGTKANGPAPHSLUR
LBI-OPEN
Binding, clarify IHL
NO
REG-SOFT
Responsible use, no treaty
GB
CCW-ONLY
The CCW forum only
INUS
OPPOSE
No new law
none coded yet

CCW-ONLY since 2024-12-02, EXPLICIT

Supports the CCW/GGE consensus process only, no stated outcome position.

India holds that the CCW GGE is the appropriate forum and that the UNGA track duplicates it: its 2024 explanation of vote states it abstained because parallel mandates duplicate efforts and resources, while the GGE addresses the full range of challenges. The vote trajectory (No in 2023, Abstain in 2024, Yes in 2025) is a change in posture toward the UNGA resolutions; the research record shows no change in the underlying forum preference, so no position shift event is coded. Whether the 2025 Yes reflects substantive softening is an open question that the unretrieved 2025 explanation of vote decides.

India abstained on the 2024 resolution, stating its reason in its own explanation of vote.

India has abstained on the resolution L.77

Explanation of vote by India on resolution 79/62 (L.77), Lethal autonomous weapons systems, November 2024 source

India objects to parallel UNGA mandates as duplicating the CCW GGE's work.

Parallel mandates and processes on lethal autonomous weapons systems also amount to a duplication of efforts and resources

Explanation of vote by India on resolution 79/62 (L.77), Lethal autonomous weapons systems, November 2024 source

In its own 2025 working paper India supports prohibiting the use of fully autonomous LAWS that cannot comply with IHL.

India supports the prohibition of the use of fully autonomous LAWS which cannot be used in compliance with IHL

Working Paper - Emerging Technologies in the area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (CCW/GGE.1/2025/WP.3), 2025-05-16 source

For all other LAWS India calls for appropriate regulation of their use.

For all other LAWS, the GGE should identify measures for appropriate regulations on their use

Working Paper - Emerging Technologies in the area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (CCW/GGE.1/2025/WP.3), 2025-05-16 source

India frames those regulations as implemented through national measures.

Appropriate regulations arising out of any possible framework should be implemented nationally

Working Paper - Emerging Technologies in the area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (CCW/GGE.1/2025/WP.3), 2025-05-16 source

This state shown large among peers · hover a mark for its coding

How did it vote?

Votes: No, Abstain, Yes across the three resolutions.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

152in favour of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favour of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favour of 193
In favour Against Abstained Non-voting India

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Membership is fact, not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 0
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 0
No treaty-track membership on recordNone recorded

Hover a track header to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When is it on the record?

The engagement cadence, dated.

5acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for its act · a legend chip lights that type

What has it written down at home?

National doctrine.

No published national policy identified by this project, as of 2026-07-17.

Research pass 5d (2026-07-17) reviewed the record and identified no published national directive on autonomy in weapon systems. No published national policy specifically governing autonomy in weapons systems identified by this project, as of 2026-07-17.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.