Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Ghana

GHA · GHANA · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN). Supports a legally binding treaty that prohibits some systems.

Ghana among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
GHARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
ALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN), since 2024-10-24, interpreted (INFERRED)

At the UN in October 2024, Ghana said autonomous weapons need clear regulation and, echoing the joint call by the UN Secretary-General and the Red Cross, new prohibitions and restrictions. In October 2026 it said it supports negotiating a legally binding instrument. Read together, that is support for a treaty with bans.

Ghana says autonomous weapons must be addressed through clear regulations.

These systems raise serious humanitarian, legal, and ethical questions, which must be addressed through clear regulations.

Ghana: statement at the First Committee thematic debate on conventional weapons, 79th session, 2024-10-24 source

Ghana, citing the Secretary-General and ICRC joint call, says new prohibitions and restrictions are needed.

new prohibitions and restrictions on autonomous weapons are needed to mitigate the risks they pose to international security

Ghana: statement at the First Committee thematic debate on conventional weapons, 79th session, 2024-10-24 source

Ghana supports negotiating a legally binding instrument on lethal autonomous weapons systems.

My delegation supports the negotiation of a legally binding instrument on lethal autonomous weapons systems

Ghana: statement at the First Committee general debate, 81st session, 2026-10-12 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Ghana

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 1
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionEndorsed · 2026-02-05
Treaty / governance trackMember 0
No treaty-track membership on recordNone recorded

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

6acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.