Machine Politics Updated through 2026-02-06

State dossier

France

FRA · FRANCE · board row present

What does this state want?

Coded LBI-BAN: Supports a legally binding instrument that includes prohibitions.

France among the states coded so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
LBI-BAN
Binding, ban+regulate
FRARAUCRECSLDEGTKANGPAPHSLUR
LBI-OPEN
Binding, clarify IHL
NO
REG-SOFT
Responsible use, no treaty
GB
CCW-ONLY
The CCW forum only
INUS
OPPOSE
No new law
none coded yet

LBI-BAN since 2024-05-24, EXPLICIT

Supports a legally binding instrument that includes prohibitions.

France's submission for the Secretary-General's report states its preferred outcome plainly: a future instrument, possibly an Additional Protocol to the CCW, structured on a two-tier approach that prohibits fully autonomous systems and regulates partially autonomous ones. The prohibition is category-scoped (fully autonomous only), which this coding's scope note carries so France is not misread as supporting a blanket ban.

France states in its UN submission that it supports negotiating and adopting a new CCW Additional Protocol on LAWS.

France supports the negotiation and adoption of an Additional Protocol to the CCW

Resolution 78/241 Lethal autonomous weapons systems: Submission of France, 2024-05-24 source

France's preferred instrument follows a two-tier prohibit-and-regulate structure.

structuring this future instrument — which could take the form of an Additional Protocol to the CCW

Resolution 78/241 Lethal autonomous weapons systems: Submission of France, 2024-05-24 source

The instrument France describes follows the two-tier prohibit-and-regulate structure.

according to a two-tier approach

Resolution 78/241 Lethal autonomous weapons systems: Submission of France, 2024-05-24 source

France attached its own draft instrument as an annex to the submission.

Detailed proposal for such an instrument can be found in Annex of the present submission

Resolution 78/241 Lethal autonomous weapons systems: Submission of France, 2024-05-24 source

This state shown large among peers · hover a mark for its coding

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

152in favour of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favour of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favour of 193
In favour Against Abstained Non-voting France

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Membership is fact, not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 3
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Call to ActionEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionEndorsed · 2026-02-05
Treaty / governance trackMember 1
Joint statement to the September 2025 session of the CCW GGE on LAWS, delivered by BrazilMember · 2025-09-01

Hover a track header to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When is it on the record?

The engagement cadence, dated.

8acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for its act · a legend chip lights that type

What has it written down at home?

National doctrine.

Avis sur l'intégration de l'autonomie dans les systèmes d'armes létaux (Defence Ethics Committee opinion on autonomy in lethal weapon systems) · 2021-04-29 · core doctrine
  • 2021-04-29 · Avis sur l'intégration de l'autonomie dans les systèmes d'armes létaux (Defence Ethics Committee opinion on autonomy in lethal weapon systems)core doctrine, filled marker · source

Avis sur l'intégration de l'autonomie dans les systèmes d'armes létaux (Defence Ethics Committee opinion on autonomy in lethal weapon systems)

Opinion of the Comité d'éthique de la défense (Ministère des Armées), dated 29 April 2021 on its face; the committee was seized by the Minister on 10 January 2020. Quotes below are from the Ministry's OFFICIAL ENGLISH version (translation: official). RULED CORE 2026-07-19: core = the opinion plus the government's adopting and citing statements (a 2025 parliamentary answer, QE 8402, cites it as the standing national reference framework). Formally an advisory opinion; in practice the government's standing framework. The opinion's own architecture is six guiding principles and 25 guidelines; it extends the refusal beyond use to manufacturing and export (P3), and traces the renunciation to the 5 April 2019 Saclay declaration (footnote 10). The URL carries a double .pdf extension in the ministry's own href; that is intentional, not a typo.

The French government has renounced the use of lethal autonomous weapon systems, and the Defence Ethics Committee endorsed that decision.

The French government has declared that it renounces the use of LAWS.

Avis sur l'integration de l'autonomie dans les systemes d'armes letaux (Opinion on integrating autonomy into lethal weapon systems), 2021-04-29 source

The Committee judged the renunciation unquestionably sound in light of the principles governing the French armed forces.

The Committee regards this decision as unquestionably sound

Avis sur l'integration de l'autonomie dans les systemes d'armes letaux (Opinion on integrating autonomy into lethal weapon systems), 2021-04-29 source

The refusal extends beyond use to the manufacturing and export of fully autonomous lethal systems.

Such use, as well as manufacturing and exporting, should be refused.

Avis sur l'integration de l'autonomie dans les systemes d'armes letaux (Opinion on integrating autonomy into lethal weapon systems), 2021-04-29 source

Partially autonomous systems are acceptable only if all five guarantees (the "5 Cs" - command, risk control, compliance, competence, confidence) are met.

The design and implementation of PALWS should therefore only be contemplated if all the guarantees of their correct use are met

Avis sur l'integration de l'autonomie dans les systemes d'armes letaux (Opinion on integrating autonomy into lethal weapon systems), 2021-04-29 source

Context on record
Context on record
Context on record
Context on record

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.