Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Algeria

DZA · ALGERIA · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN). Supports negotiating a treaty but has not said what it should prohibit.

Algeria among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
ARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
DZALBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN), since 2021-10-12, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

Algeria told the UN First Committee in 2021 that there is an urgent need for a legally binding instrument on autonomous weapons, and said the same again in 2025. Its own statements do not say what such a treaty should ban, so on this site's scale it wants a treaty with terms open.

Algeria calls for a legally binding instrument on lethal autonomous weapons systems.

stresses the urgent need to pursue a legally-binding instrument on LAWS

Statement by Algeria, UNGA 76 First Committee thematic discussion, 2021-10-12 source

Algeria repeats in 2025 that a legally binding instrument is urgently needed.

Arabic-only statement in the conventional weapons debate. Algeria says human control over these systems is essential for compliance with international humanitarian law, that the GGE's outputs give a suitable basis for negotiating a legally binding instrument, and that the need for one is urgent and cannot be postponed. Statement by Algeria, UNGA 80 First Committee thematic debate, conventional weapons (Arabic), 2025-10-24 source

In 2026 Algeria welcomes the GGE's consensus on elements and asks for real progress at the Review Conference.

Algeria welcomes the consensus reached in the Group of Governmental Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems

Statement of Algeria, UNGA 81 First Committee general debate, 2026-10-08 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Algeria

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 0
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 0
No treaty-track membership on recordNone recorded

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

6acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.