Machine Politics Updated through 2026-02-06

State dossier

Germany

DEU · GERMANY · board row present

What does this state want?

Coded LBI-BAN: Supports a legally binding instrument that includes prohibitions.

Germany among the states coded so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
LBI-BAN
Binding, ban+regulate
DEARAUCRECSLFRGTKANGPAPHSLUR
LBI-OPEN
Binding, clarify IHL
NO
REG-SOFT
Responsible use, no treaty
GB
CCW-ONLY
The CCW forum only
INUS
OPPOSE
No new law
none coded yet

LBI-BAN since 2024-05-24, EXPLICIT

Supports a legally binding instrument that includes prohibitions.

Germany's national contribution to the Secretary-General's report supports a legally binding instrument in the CCW GGE that prohibits lethal autonomous weapons systems that cannot comply with international humanitarian law, and separately supports an additional CCW protocol prohibiting LAWS operating outside human control, with regulation for other systems. The human-decision principle is stated in its own words.

Germany supports a CCW additional protocol prohibiting LAWS outside human control.

Germany supports the creation of an additional protocol to the CCW that entails the prohibition of LAWS operating outside of human control

UN Secretary-General's Report on lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS): Germany's national contribution, 2024-05-24 source

The human-decision principle grounds the German position.

The decision over life and death must be made by humans.

UN Secretary-General's Report on lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS): Germany's national contribution, 2024-05-24 source

This state shown large among peers · hover a mark for its coding

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

152in favour of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favour of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favour of 193
In favour Against Abstained Non-voting Germany

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Membership is fact, not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 3
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Call to ActionEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionEndorsed · 2026-02-05
Treaty / governance trackMember 3
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/78/L.56 as tabled (became resolution 78/241)Member · 2023-10-12
Joint Statement in Support of the CCW LAWS GGE (CCW/GGE.1/2025/WP.8)Member · 2025-09-03
Joint statement to the September 2025 session of the CCW GGE on LAWS, delivered by BrazilMember · 2025-09-01

Hover a track header to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When is it on the record?

The engagement cadence, dated.

10acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for its act · a legend chip lights that type

What has it written down at home?

National doctrine.

No published national policy identified by this project, as of 2026-07-17.

Research pass 5b (2026-07-17) reviewed the German record: German security analysts themselves note the absence of a national directive on weapon autonomy in the DoDD 3000.09 sense; the position lives in coalition-treaty language and international submissions. No published national policy specifically governing autonomy in weapons systems identified by this project, as of 2026-07-17.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.