Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Colombia

COL · COLOMBIA · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN). Supports a legally binding treaty that prohibits some systems.

Colombia among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
COARATBRBGCLCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
ALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN), since 2023-05-11, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

Colombia is a named author of the revised Draft Protocol VI of May 2023, a proposed treaty for the Geneva weapons convention. It would ban autonomous weapons that cannot be used with meaningful human control and regulate the rest. In October 2023 Colombia told the First Committee that a binding instrument should ban fully autonomous weapons and regulate all others.

Colombia co-authored a draft CCW protocol whose Article 3 prohibits a class of autonomous weapons.

It is prohibited to design, develop, produce, possess, acquire, deploy, transfer, or use, under any circumstances, autonomous weapon systems

Draft Protocol on Autonomous Weapon Systems (Protocol VI) (CCW/GGE.1/2023/WP.6), 2023-05-11 source

The prohibition covers systems that cannot be used with meaningful human control.

autonomous weapon systems that cannot be used with meaningful human control in their critical functions of selecting, targeting, or engaging to apply force.

Draft Protocol on Autonomous Weapon Systems (Protocol VI) (CCW/GGE.1/2023/WP.6), 2023-05-11 source

Colombia says autonomous weapons should be governed by a binding instrument that bans fully autonomous weapons and regulates the rest.

In its First Committee general debate statement, Colombia says it is urgent to continue discussing autonomous weapon systems, and that they should be regulated by a binding international instrument that prohibits the development of fully autonomous weapons and regulates all other autonomous weapon systems so that they remain under meaningful human control. Intervención de Colombia, Debate General, Primera Comisión, 78 Período de Sesiones (9 de octubre de 2023), 2023-10-09 source

Colombia co-signed a 2024 group submission to the Secretary-General calling for binding rules with regulations and prohibitions.

require the development of legally binding rules and principles, including regulations and prohibitions

Lethal autonomous weapons systems: report of the Secretary-General (A/79/88), 2024-05-24 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Colombia

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 0
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 1
Joint statement to the September 2025 session of the CCW GGE on LAWS, delivered by BrazilMember · 2025-09-01

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

7acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.