Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Burkina Faso

BFA · BURKINA FASO · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN). Supports negotiating a treaty but has not said what it should prohibit.

Burkina Faso among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
ARATBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
BFALDZBECICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN), since 2024-10-23, interpreted (INFERRED)

In a French-language statement to the UN in October 2024, Burkina Faso said it is urgent to draw up a legally binding instrument on lethal autonomous weapons. It did not say what the instrument should ban. In 2025 it added that human control must stay central. That is support for a treaty with its terms left open.

Burkina Faso calls it urgent to develop a legally binding instrument on lethal autonomous weapons systems.

In paragraph 5, Burkina Faso says it shares the Non-Aligned Movement's view that lethal autonomous weapons systems raise many ethical, legal, moral and technical questions, and that it considers it urgent to develop a legally binding instrument on these systems to meet the humanitarian and international security challenges they pose. No prohibitions are mentioned. Burkina Faso: statement at the First Committee thematic debate on conventional weapons, 79th session (French), 2024-10-23 source

In 2025 Burkina Faso says human control must be central to autonomous weapon systems.

Regarding artificial intelligence and autonomous weapon systems, Burkina Faso considers that human control must be a central feature.

General Assembly First Committee, 80th session, 4th meeting, automatic speech recognition transcript, 2025-10-10 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Burkina Faso

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 0
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNot on the list
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionNot on the list
Treaty / governance trackMember 0
No treaty-track membership on recordNone recorded

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

5acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.