Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Austria

AUT · AUSTRIA · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN). Supports a legally binding treaty that prohibits some systems.

Austria among the states with a position so far
← seeks the most binding lawseeks no new law →
Wants a treaty with bans
LBI-BAN
ATARBRBGCLCOCRCUDOECEGSVFJFRDEGHGTHTIEITJOKZKEKILBLUMWMXNLNZNINGPKPAPEPHPTSMSLESLKTTUYZW
Wants a treaty, terms open
LBI-OPEN
ALDZBEBFCICDGQIDIQJMNOSASNRSZAVUZM
Wants new rules, not a treaty
REG-SOFT
TLTRGB
Keep it in Geneva
CCW-ONLY
KHGEHUINIRMEQASDTHUAAEUS
No new rules
OPPOSE
RU

Wants a treaty, terms open (LBI-OPEN), since 2018-08-30, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

Supports negotiating a treaty but has not said what it should prohibit.

Austria, with Brazil and Chile, formally proposed that the Geneva convention start negotiating a treaty to guarantee meaningful human control. The proposal did not yet say what the treaty should ban.

The 2018 working paper proposes a mandate to negotiate a legally binding instrument.

negotiate a legally-binding instrument to ensure meaningful human control over critical functions in lethal autonomous weapon systems

Proposal for a Mandate to Negotiate a Legally-binding Instrument that addresses the Legal, Humanitarian and Ethical Concerns posed by Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (CCW/GGE.2/2018/WP.7), 2018-08-30 source

Wants a treaty with bans (LBI-BAN), since 2024-04-30, stated directly (EXPLICIT)

As chair of the April 2024 Vienna conference, and in its submission to the UN Secretary-General, Austria said it supports a treaty made of prohibitions and regulations, to be concluded by 2026. Austria started the UN resolution track in 2023 and voted Yes on all three resolutions.

The chair's summary affirms commitment to an international legal instrument on autonomous weapons systems.

affirms our strong commitment to work with urgency and with all interested stakeholders for an international legal instrument to regulate autonomous weapons systems

Humanity at the Crossroads: Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Challenge of Regulation. Chair's Summary, 2024-04-30 source

The chair's summary records convergence on explicit prohibitions within a two-tier structure.

There is strong convergence that AWS that cannot be used in accordance with international law or that are ethically unacceptable should be explicitly prohibited.

Humanity at the Crossroads: Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Challenge of Regulation. Chair's Summary, 2024-04-30 source

Austria's submission states support for a legally binding instrument structured as prohibitions plus regulations.

Austria will therefore promote negotiations for a legally binding instrument that consists of prohibitions and regulations.

UNGA Resolution 78/241: Submission by Austria, 2024-05-28 source

Austria endorses 2026 as the target date for concluding a legally binding instrument.

the objective of concluding a legally-binding instrument by 2026 is an appropriate target date

UNGA Resolution 78/241: Submission by Austria, 2024-05-28 source

Austria reaffirms its position in favor of a legally binding instrument in 2025.

emphasize its position in favour of a legally binding instrument on autonomous weapons systems

UNGA Resolution 79/239: Submission by Austria, 2025-05-12 source

The Foreign Ministry states the national position for international legal regulation with human control.

Austria takes the clear position that significant human control over autonomous weapon systems is necessary and supports the international legal regulation of these weapon systems.

Autonomous Weapons Systems (ministry topic page, undated; date given is access date), 2026-07-16 source

Austria wants a negotiating mandate at the Review Conference, built on the agreed elements.

It is therefore vital for our efforts` credibility that the set of elements agreed by consensus now serves as a basis for a negotiation mandate.

Preparatory Committee, 7th Review Conference CCW: Statement on behalf of Austria, Preparation for Main Committee II, 2026-09-08 source

Austria's goal is a protocol that draws a line between acceptable and unacceptable systems.

finalize work on a protocol to draw the line between the acceptable and the unacceptable

Preparatory Committee, 7th Review Conference CCW: Statement on behalf of Austria, Preparation for Main Committee II, 2026-09-08 source

Austria restates that humans must stay in control of autonomous weapon systems.

Humans must always remain in control over autonomous weapon systems.

Preparatory Committee, 7th Review Conference CCW: Statement on behalf of Austria, Preparation for Main Committee II, 2026-09-08 source

Shift: wants a treaty, terms open → wants a treaty with bans 2024-04-30

First verified Austrian-authored text committing to explicit prohibitions.

There is strong convergence that AWS that cannot be used in accordance with international law or that are ethically unacceptable should be explicitly prohibited.

Humanity at the Crossroads: Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Challenge of Regulation. Chair's Summary, 2024-04-30 source

The submission commits to promoting negotiations for an instrument of prohibitions and regulations.

Austria will therefore promote negotiations for a legally binding instrument that consists of prohibitions and regulations.

UNGA Resolution 78/241: Submission by Austria, 2024-05-28 source

Shown large among its peers · hover a mark for its position

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Austria

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 2
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Call to ActionNot on the list
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionEndorsed · 2026-02-05
Treaty / governance trackMember 4
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/78/L.56 as tabled (became resolution 78/241)Member · 2023-10-12
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/79/L.77 as tabled (became resolution 79/62)Member · 2024-10-18
Co-sponsors of A/C.1/80/L.41 as tabled (became resolution 80/57)Member · 2025-10-14
Joint statement to the September 2025 session of the CCW GGE on LAWS, delivered by BrazilMember · 2025-09-01

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

15acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.