Machine Politics Updated through 2026-11-04

State dossier

Armenia

ARM · ARMENIA · on the world map

What does it want?

Position: unclear or shifting (AMBIG). Has said things that point in more than one direction.

Unclear or shifting (AMBIG), since 2025-10-23, points both ways (AMBIGUOUS)

At the First Committee in October 2025, Armenia said it fully supports the two-tier approach: autonomous weapons that cannot be used lawfully must be prohibited, and other systems brought in line with the laws of war. That points toward a treaty with bans. Armenia did not say the rules should be legally binding, and its own focus was on controlling transfers of these weapons. Armenia voted Yes on all three UN resolutions.

Armenia endorses the two-tier approach of prohibitions plus regulation.

Armenia fully supports the two-tiered approach

Statement by Armenia, First Committee thematic discussion on conventional weapons, 80th session, 2025-10-23 source

Armenia says systems that cannot comply with the laws of war must be prohibited.

weapon systems that are inherently indiscriminate and cannot be employed in compliance with international humanitarian law must be prohibited

Statement by Armenia, First Committee thematic discussion on conventional weapons, 80th session, 2025-10-23 source

Armenia notes there is no dedicated instrument yet, without saying what form one should take.

At a time when there is no dedicated international instrument regulating this domain

Statement by Armenia, First Committee thematic discussion on conventional weapons, 80th session, 2025-10-23 source

How did it vote?

Yes on all three UN votes on autonomous weapons.

Resolution A/RES/78/241

2023-12-22 · A/RES/78/241 ↗
152in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/79/62

2024-12-02 · A/RES/79/62 ↗
166in favor of 193

Resolution A/RES/80/57

2025-12-01 · A/RES/80/57 ↗
164in favor of 193
In favor Against Abstained Non-voting Armenia

Hover a legend chip to light those votes · each resolution links to its record

What has it signed?

Being on a list is a fact. Not being on one is not opposition.

Responsible-use trackEndorsed 3
Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Call to ActionEndorsed · 2023-02-16
REAIM Blueprint for ActionNamed list not located
REAIM 2026 Pathways to ActionEndorsed · 2026-02-05
Treaty / governance trackMember 0
No treaty-track membership on recordNone recorded

Hover a column heading to light its signings · click a seal to open the document

When has it spoken?

Every time it went on the record, dated.

7acts on record
Submissions & papersFramework pledgesJoint statementsRecorded votesRecord to date
2014201820222026
Submission Framework pledge Joint statement Recorded vote

Hover a mark for what it was · a legend chip lights that type

What rules has it written at home?

Its own military policy.

Military policy not yet reviewed by this site, as of 2026-11-04.

The record

The documents on file.

Each mark opens its source

ReadingPoint at any mark to read its record. Click a mark to open the evidence.Tap any mark to read its record and open the evidence.